Author: V. T. Musbakhova (Thessaloniki (Greece))

Pages\n 664–682

Summary\n: Lines 1036–1058 of the Orphic Argonautica are studied in the article in the context of the tradition of the Argonauts’ return journeys from Aeaetes’ kingdom. The author arrives at the conclusion that the navigation of the Argonauts in the Phasis in this poem goes back to an archaic source (probably the Orphic Argonautica of 6 BC) where this river served the Argonauts as a way of escape to the Ocean in the east, while in the preceding part of the narration the poet followed Apollonius’ Argonautica and in the subsequent part he drew upon the tradition going back to Timaeus, according to which the Argonauts sailed up the Tanais to the northern Ocean. This is why in the presentation of the Phasis in OA the traits of the two rivers — the archaic Phasis and the Apollonius’ Phasis — are combined. The particularities of the archaic Phasis may be detected in the following features: 1) its banks are inhabited by the tribes of Cercetae and Sindoi; 2) it is connected with both the Cimmerius Bosporus and the Maeotian lake (by the branch called Saranges); 3) the Caucasus is situated on the Phasis and Erytheia is described as a valley or a gorge nearby where the Phasis flows; 4) the latter may be interpreted as a goal of Hercules’ trip to the East in the myth about Hercules and the cattle of Geryon, which undergoes a remarkable geographical expansion during the Archaic age when it began to include Italy, Thrace up to the Hellespont, and even Scythia (the mention of Hercules’ crossing of the Cimmerian Bosporus on a bull at OA 1056–58 also points to this tradition). This interpretation of Caucasian Erytheia on the Phasis would agree with the role of archaic Phasis as the channel connected to the Ocean in the east and symmetrical to the Pillars of Hercules in the west. These facts allow the author to hypothesize that the archaic Phasis was the river Kuban, to which many other data point independently.

Keywords\n: Orphic Argonautica, Apollonius’ Argonautica, Argonauts’ journey, Phasis, Tanais.

References\n

Dovatur A. I., Kallistov D. P., Shishova I. A. Narody nashey strany v «Istorii» Gerodota [Peoples of our country in the 'History' of Herodotus]. M.: Nauka, 1982. (In Russ.).
Musbakhova V. T. Prometey Prikovannyy. Problema avtorstva i datirovki tragedii [Prometheus Bound. The problem of authorship and date]. SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2013. (In Russ.).
Musbakhova V. T. Kompleks antichnykh svidetel'stv o lokalizatsii tsarstva Eeta v Prikuban'e [Ancient evidence in the localization of the Aeëtes’ kingdom in the Kuban Region]. Materialy Shestoy mezhdunarodnoy Kubanskoy arkheologicheskoy konferentsii [Proceedings of the 6th International Kuban Archaeological Conference]. Krasnodar: Ekoinvest, 2013, pp. 301–306. (In Russ.).
Musbakhova V. T. V poiskakh granitsy mezhdu Evropoy i Aziey: Gekatey Miletskiy [Finding the border between Europe and Asia: Hecataeus of Miletus]. Ladoga v kontekste istorii i arkheologii severnoy Evrazii. Sbornik statey pamyati D. A. Machinskogo [The Ladoga from the historical and archaeological perspective of North Eurasia. A collection of works in memory of D. A. Machinsky]. SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2014, pp. 75–92. (In Russ.).
P'yankov I. V. Massagety Gerodota [The Massagets of Herodotus]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History], 1975, no. 2, pp. 46–70. (In Russ.).
Bacon J.R. The Geography of the Orphic Argonautica. CQ, 1931, vol. 25, pp. 172–183.
Jacoby F. Fragmente dergriechischen Historiker. Erster Teil A, a. Leiden, 1957.
Moreau A. Les transformations du périple des Argonautes. Un miroir des progrès de la colonisation grecque. Euphrosyne, 2000, vol. 28, pp. 325–34.
Vian F. Les navigations des Argonautes. Élaboration d'une légende. BAGB, 1982, pp. 273–85.
Vian F. Les retours des Argonautes et le progrès des connaissances géographiques. REL, 1986, vol. 64. 13–5.
Vian F. (ed.) Les Argonautiques Orphiques. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1986.