Indo-European linguistics and classical philology
M. I. Novikova Latin faxo and Venetic vha.g.s.to (pp. 727–736)
Author
M. I. Novikova (Saint Petersburg State University)
Pages\n 727–736
Summary\n
The Latin language has a number of sigmatic future verb forms of the so-called faxo-type ‘I shall make’. There are different views on the origins of the faxo-type: some believe it go back to the Indo-European desiderative, others connect it with the Indo-European sigmatic aorist. Closely connected with this problem is the interpretation of the Venetic data and the relation between the Venetic form vha.g.s.to ‘he made’ and the Latin faxo-type. In the article, it is shown that, albeit the similar stem structure, Latin and Venetic sigmatic formations differ in the type of the suffix. The faxo-type is then considered to be a desiderative formation whereas the Venetic sigmatic forms go back to the sigmatic aorist.
Keywords\n
Latin, Venetic, sigmatic future, sigmatic aorist, desiderative.
References\n
  1. Lindsey U. M. Kratkaya istoricheskaya grammatika latinskogo yazyka [A short historical Latin grammar]. F. A. Petrovskiy (transl.). M., 2010. (In Russ.).
  2. Szemerényi O. Vvedenie v sravnitel'noe yazykoznanie [Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics]. B. A. Abramov (transl.). M., 2002. (In Russ.).
  3. Tronsky I. M. Istoricheskaya grammatika latinskogo yazyka [Historical grammar of Latin]. M., 2011. (In Russ.).
  4. Ernu A. Istoricheskaya morfologiya latinskogo yazyka [Historical morphology of Latin]. I. M. Tronsky (transl.). M., 2010. (In Russ.).
  5. Beeler M. S. The Venetic language. Berkeley, 1949.
  6. Benveniste É. Les futurs et subjonctifs sigmatiques du latin archaïque. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 1922, no. 23, pp. 32–63.
  7. Brugmann K. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Zweiter Band. Zweite Halfte. Strassburg, 1892.
  8. De Melo W. D. C. The sigmatic future in Plautus. Theory and Description in Latin Linguistics. Selected Papers from the XIth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics. Bolkestein A. M. et al (ed.). Amsterdam, 2002, pp. 75–90.
  9. De Melo W. D. C. Traces of an Earlier Verbal System in Archaic Latin – The Meaning and Usage of the Types faxō / faxim / impetrāssere, duim, and attigās. D. Phil. thesis. 2 vols. Oxford. 2004
  10. De Melo W. D. C. The sigmatic subjunctive in Plautus and Terence. Papers on Grammar. IX 1. Latina Lingua! Proceedings of the 12 Intern. Coll. on Latin Linguistics. G. Calboli (ed.). Rome, 2005, pp. 45–56.
  11. De Melo W. D. C. The sigmatic future and the genetic Affiliation of Venetic: Latin faxo ‘I shall make‘ and Venetic vha.g.s.to ‘he made‘. Transactions of the Philological Society, vol. 105, no. 1. (March 2007), pp. 1–10.
  12. de Vaan M. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages. Leiden, 2008.
  13. Ernout A. Morphologie historique du latin. Paris, 1953.
  14. Jasanoff J. PIE *ǵnē- ‘recognose, know’. Die Laringaltheorie und die Rekonstruktion des indogermanischen Laut- und Formensystems. Bammesberger A. (ed.). Heidelberg, 1988, pp. 195–197.
  15. Lejeune M. Manuel de la langue vénète. Heidelberg, 1974.
  16. Leumann M., Hofmann J. B., Szantyr A. Lateinische Grammatik. Bd. 1. München, 1977.
  17. Lindsay W. M. Syntax of Plautus. Oxford, 1907.
  18. Lindsay W. (ed.) T. Macci Plauti Comoediae. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1904–1905.
  19. Rix H. u.a.Verf. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Wiesbaden, 2008.
  20. Meiser G. Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt, 1998.
  21. Rix H. Bemerkungen zu den lateinischen Verbformen des Typs faxo faxim‘. Mír Curad. Studies in Honor of C. Watkins. J. H. Jasanoff, H. C. Melchert, L. Oliver. Innsbruck, 1998, pp. 619–634.
  22. Sjögren H. Zum Gebrauch des Futurums im Altlateinischen. Uppsala, 1906.
  23. Sommer F. Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre. Heidelberg, 1914.
  24. Stolz F., Schmalz J. H. Lateinische Grammatik. Laut- unde Formenlehre. Syntax und Stilistik. Munchen, 1910.
  25. Untermann J. Gr. ethēka ~ lat. feci, gr. hēka ~ lat. ieci? Meiser G. (ed.) Veni, vidi, vici: die Vorgeschichte des lateinischen Perfektsystems. München, 2003.
  26. Untermann J. Wörterbuch des Oskisch-Umbrischen. Heidelberg, 2000.
  27. Weiss M. Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor, 2009.