Indo-European linguistics and classical philology
A. Yu. Bratukhin Ἡ ἀληθὴς φιλοσοφία of Clement of Alexandria (pp. 123–131)
Author
A. Yu. Bratukhin (Perm State University)
Pages\n 123–131
Summary\n
The early Christian literature during the hundred years has passed the way from the unsophisticated works, which were written by the Apostolic Fathers exclusively for their coreligionists, until the exquisite philosophical treatises of Clement of Alexandria. However the main Christian genre of the Second Century is apologetic. Such apologists as Aristides, Justin Martyr, Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus and others defended the new religion in front of pagans. These authors opposed the Christianity to the Greek philosophy. They considered it as strange and alien from the classical tradition, even if they called their doctrine “our barbarian philosophy (ἡ καθʼ ἡμᾶς βάρβαρος φιλοσοφία)” (Tatian. Orat. 35, 1) or simply “our philosophy (ἡ γὰρ καθʼ ἡμᾶς φιλοσοφία)” (Melito apud Eus. H. E, IV, 26, 7). Clement of Alexandria unlike them no always identified the orthodox Christianity with “barbarian philosophy” (sometimes he marked heretical schools by this notion too). Except “barbarian philosophy” he mentioned the Hebrew philosophy and the philosophy of Egyptians and Indians. Clement uses, as Plato did, words “the true philosophy” (ἡ ἀληθὴς φιλοσοφία). It becomes for him a summit of all previous doctrines. Synonyms of this notion are for him “genuine philosophy (ἡ ὄντως φιλοσοφία)” and “right (ὀρθή) philosophy”. This method allows Clement to speak with his readers as philosopher with philosophers. He not only writes about the synthesis of “the various elements of truth found in both Hebrew and Greek philosophy”, as A. C. Ittrer says, but makes the new doctrine (“the true philosophy”) the legitimate heir of the Greek philosophy. The Hebrew and Greek elements in his synthesis are not equal: Clement as usual doesn’t distinguish between “barbarian / Hebrew philosophy” as the pure Biblical doctrine and “the true philosophy”. Last term has meaning “orthodox Christian doctrine” and contrasts both Greek schools and Christian sects.
Keywords\n
Early Christianity, apology, the Alexandrian school, Clement of Alexandria, philosophical treatise.
References\n
  1. Averintsev S. S. Antichnaya ritorika i sud'by antichnogo ratsionalizma [Classical Rhetoric and the fate of classical Rationalism]. Antichnaya poetika. Ritoricheskaya teoriya i literaturnaya praktika [Classical Poetics. Rhetorical Theory and Literary Practice]. M.: Nauka, 1991, pp. 3–26. (In Russ.).
  2. Afinogenov D. E. Tatian i ego “Slovo k ellinam” v istoricheskom kontekste [Tatian and his Address to the Greeks in the historical context]. Rannekhristianskie apologety II–IV vv. Perevody i issledovaniya [The early Christian Apologists of the II–IVth centuries. Translations and Studies]. M.: Ladomir, 2000, pp. 80–92. (In Russ.).
  3. Bol'shakov A. P. «Elliny» i «ellinskaya mudrost'» v proizvedeniyakh rannekhristiasnskikh apologetov [«Greeks» and «the Hellenic wisdom» in the early Christian Apologetics]. Drevniy Vostok i antichnyy mir. Trudy kafedry istorii Drevnego mira Istoricheskogo fakul'teta MGU [Ancient Orient and the Classical World. Transactions of the Department of History of Antiquity of the History faculty of MSU], no. IV. M.: MSU, 2001, pp. 125–139. (In Russ.).
  4. Bol'shakov A. P. Rannekhristianskie apologii: proiskhozhdenie i soderzhanie [The Early Christian Apologies: Genesis and Content]. Drevniy Vostok i antichnyy mir. Trudy kafedry istorii Drevnego mira Istoricheskogo fakul'teta MGU [Ancient Orient and the Classical World. Transactions of the Department of History of Antiquity of the History faculty of MSU], no. V. M.: EkoPress-2000, 2002, pp. 151–165. (In Russ.).
  5. Vdovichenko A. V. Khristianskaya apologiya. Kratkiy obzor traditsii [Christian apology. A brief survey of the tradition]. Rannekhristianskie apologety II–IV vv. Perevody i issledovaniya [The early Christian Apologists of the II–IVth centuries. Translations and Studies]. M.: Ladomir, 2000, pp. 5–38. (In Russ.).
  6. Vdovichenko A. V. Diskurs–tekst–slovo. Stat'i po istorii, bibleistike, lingvistike, filosofii yazyka [Discourse-text-word. Articles on History, Biblical studies, Linguistics, Philosophy of Language]. M.: The publishing house of St. Tikhon Orthodox University of Humanities, 2002. (In Russ.).
  7. Itter A. C. Esoteric teaching in the Stromateis of Clement of Alexandria. Leiden, Boston, 2009. XVIII.
  8. Krause W. Die Stellung der frühchristlichen Autoren zur heidnischen Literatur. Wien: Herder, 1958.
  9. Lattey C. The deification of man in Clement of Alexandria: some further notes. The Journal of Theological Studies, 1916, vol. 17, no. 67. 257–262.
  10. Osborn E. Tertullian, first theologian of the West. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1997.
  11. Osborn E.F. The philosophy of Clement of Alexandria. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1957.
  12. Prunet O. La morale de Clément d’Alexandrie et le Nouveau Testament. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 196.