Indo-European linguistics and classical philology
A. V. Shatskov Another verbal suffix in Hittite? (pp. 987–995)
Author
A. V. Shatskov (Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences)
Pages\n 987–995
Summary\n
Hittite verbs hassikk- ‘to satiate oneself’ and malikk- ‘to become weak’ have an obscure stem-final ‑kk‑, which did not belong to the root, as is clear from the comparison with Pal. has- and Hitt. malisku- respectively. In several more verbs, like hark- ‘to perish’, the final ‑k- is also likely to be a suffix. The function of this suffix which already was not productive in Old Hittite is unclear but it can tentatively be compared to ‑κ‑ of the perfect stem in Greek.
Keywords\n
morphology, etymology, Hittite, comparative linguistics, suffix, verb.
References\n
  1. Kazansky N. N. Grammatika poryadkov i problemy praindoevropeyskoy rekonstruktsii [The grammar of orders and the issues of the Indo-european reconstruction]. V prostranstve yazyka i kul'tury: Zvuk, znak, smysl. Sb. st. v chest' 70-letiya V. A. Vinogradova [In the Realm of Language and Culture: the Sound, the Sign, the Meaning. A Collection of Articles on the Occasion of 70th Anniversary of V.A. Vinogradov]. V. Z. Dem'yankov, V. Ya. Porkhomovskiy (eds.). M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2010, pp. 589–597. (In Russ.).
  2. Beekes R. S. P. Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
  3. Carruba O. Das Palaische. Texte, Grammatik, Lexikon. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz, 1970 (= StBoT 10).
  4. Hackstein O. Tocharisch und Westindogermanisch: Strukturell uneinheitliche Laryngalreflexe im Tocharischen (Uridg. * Uh1C- vs. * Uh2/3(C) und *h1R̥C- vs. *h2/3R̥C-). Sprache un Kultur der Indogermanen. Akten der X. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Innsbruck, 22.-28. September 1996. W. Meid (ed.). Innsbruck, 1998, pp. 217–236.
  5. Puhvel J. Hittite etymological dictionary. Berlin; New-York; Amsterdam: Mouton, 1984-.
  6. Hoffner H., Melchert C. A Grammar of the Hittite Language. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2008.
  7. Kimball S. Hittite Historical Phonology. Innsbruck, 1999.
  8. Klingenschmitt G. Das altarmenische Verbum. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1982.
  9. Klingenschmitt G. Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. In honorem Holger Pedersen. Kolloquium der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 26. bis 28. März 1993 in Kopenhagen. J. Rasmussen, B. Nielsen (eds.). Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1994, pp. 235–251.
  10. Kloekhorst A. Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
  11. Kocharov P. On ana-presents of Armenian. Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog. Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 27. September in Salzburg. Th. Krisch, Th. Lindner (eds.). Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2011, pp. 271–278.
  12. Kronasser H. Gutturale und dentale Erweiterungen beim hethitischen Verbum. Studies Presented to Joshua Whatmough on his Sixtieth Birthday. E. Pulgram (ed.). ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton, 1957, pp. 121–129.
  13. Rix H. et al. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. 2nd Edition. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
  14. Melchert H. C. Anatolian Historical Phonology. Amsterdam; Atlanta: Rodopi, 1994.
  15. Oettinger N. Die Stammbildung des hethitischen Verbums. Nürnberg: Hans Carl, 1979.
  16. Rieken E. Sekundäre denominale u-Stämme im Hethitischen. Multi Nominis grammaticus. Studies in Classical and indo-European Linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum on the occasion of sixty-fifth birthday. A. Cooper, J. Rau, M. Weiss (eds.). Ann Arbor; New-York: Beech Stave Press, 2013, pp. 274–284.
  17. Riemschneider K. Die Glassherstellung in Anatolien nach hethitischen Quellen. Anatolian Studies presented to Hans Gustav Güterbock on the occasion of his 65th Birthday. K. Bittel, Ph. H. J. Houwink ten Cate, E. Reiner (eds.). Istanbul, 1974, pp. 263–278.
  18. Sihler A. New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford University Press, 1995.
  19. Yakubovich I. Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language. Leiden: Brill, 2009.