Indo-European linguistics and classical philology
P. A. Kocharov. The Classical Armenian construction [X anun] ‘X in name’ from the point of view of Indo-European reconstruction (pp. 473–481)
Author
P. A. Kocharov (Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences)
Keywords\n Classical Armenian, naming constructions, syntactic isoglosses
Pages\n 473–481
Summary\n
The paper is devoted to the naming construction [X anun] ‘X in name’ in Classical Armenian. The use of this construction in the Armenian Bible translation shows that it operated as a formulaic pattern without a transparent syntactic structure. Similar naming constructions prevail in the ancient Indo-Iranian languages; a double-accusative naming construction is documented in Ancient Greek. The double-accusative construction with naming verbs, which left traces in the Indo-Iranian, Greek, and Armenian branches and which probably replaced the earlier naming construction with the verb *dheh1- ‘to put’, may be considered as a syntactic innovation shared by the late Indo-European dialects.
References\n
  1. Gercenberg L.G. Morfologicheskaya struktura slova v drevnikh indoiranskikh yazykakh [Word Morphological Structure in Old Indo-Iranian Languages]. L., 1972. (In Russ.)
  2. Ivanov Vyach.Vs. Prus. emnes, emmens ‘imya’: ierogl. luv. atimaza: khet. laman [Pruss.. emnes, emmens ‘name: Hier. Luv. atimaza: Hitt. laman]. Balto- slavyanskie issledovaniya [Balto-Slavic Studies], 1982, pp. 104-108. Moscow, 1983. (In Russ.)
  3. Krys'ko V.B. Istoricheskiy sintaksis russkogo yazyka: Obekt i perekhodnost' [The Historical Context of Russian: Object and Transitivity]. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2006. (In Russ.)
  4. Benvenuto M.C., Pompeo F. Expressions of predicative possession in Ancient Greek: “εἶναι plus dative” and “εἶναι plus genitive” constructions. D. Silvestri (ed.). Annali del Dipartimento di Studi Letterari, Linguistici e Comparati Sezione linguistica 1. Napoli, 2012, pp. 77-103.
  5. Hahn E.A. Naming constructions in some Indo-European languages. Cleveland, 1969.
  6. Hoffner H.A., Melchert H.C. A grammar of the Hittite language. Winona Lake, 2008.
  7. Jacquinod B. Le double accusatif en grec d’Homère à la fin du Ve siècle avant J.-C. Louvain-la-Neuve, 1989.
  8. Mallory J., Adams D.Q. Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. London, 1997.
  9. Martirosyan H. Etymological Dictionary of the Armenian Inherited Lexicon. Leiden, 2010.
  10. Meillet A. Esquisse d'une grammaire comparée de l'arménien classique. Vienne, 1936.
  11. Pinault G.-J. L’expression indo-européenne de la nomination. Études indo-européennes, 1982, vol. 3, pp. 22-29.
  12. Schmitt R. Dichtung und Dichtersprache in indogermanischer. Wiesbaden, 1967.